Patty Rouse, widow of James Rouse, passes away

From the Baltimore Sun: Patty Rouse, widow of Columbia founder, dies

Along with jobs, Fort Meade growth brings traffic concerns

From the Baltimore Sun: Along with jobs, Fort Meade growth brings traffic concerns

Erosion Prevention in Ellicott City

From the Baltimore Sun: Howard moves to stem erosion, pollution in Ellicott City waterway

Forest Conservation

Gorman Park, September 2011

Recently, there have been a few articles in the local press discussing forest sustainability. The Baltimore Sun wrote about complaints from forest advocates regarding development around Patapsco Valley State Park on both December 6 and December 7. After reading these articles, and driving by the Christmas tree lot set up at our local high school, I decided to look into forest conservation in Howard County.

In 1991, Maryland passed the Maryland Forest Conservation Act, which was followed by the Howard County Forest Conservation Act in 1993. These acts require developers to:  

address forest resources during the planning and review phases of land development. Any project proposing to clear or grade more than 20,000 square feet of forested land must provide a specified acreage of forest retention, reforestation, and/or afforestation relative to the proposed extent of forest clearing or grading.

The developer enters into a Forest Conservation Agreement, which is an easement, with Howard County. The developer must provide a Plat of Forest Conservation Easement (Plat), a Forest Conservation Plan (FCP), and a Deed of Forest Conservation Easement (Deed) before the County approves a final development plan. The Forest Conservation Plan details what actions the developer must take for the property in question . This includes whether the developer is engaging in forest retention or if he is to plant new trees within specific easements, including what species and sizes of trees are to be planted, and what protections are to be provided to the easements before, during, and after development.

In the event that there is no opportunity for forest conservation, the developer must pay a fee assessed per square foot of property to be developed.

The Department of Recreation and Parks (DRP) was granted the power to inspect forest easements by the Department of Planning and Zoning (DPZ) in 2001.

Now Agreements permit DRP staff to access easement areas to complete forest conservation inspections and to investigate possible violations of the Howard County FCA.  DRP staff members are directed by County planners within DPZ when to inspect specific forest conservation projects.  The costs of inspections are funded through fees paid by developers to the County.  Investigations of possible FCA violations are initiated by reports from concerned citizens, through the use of aerial photography or Geographical Information System (GIS) maps, and as a result of County personnel discovering a possible violation during the completion of their day-to-day activities.

Howard County requires a two-year survival and maintenance period for all forest conservation projects. Developers are required to post a bond throughout this period to guarantee compliance. A forest conservation project must pass an initial inspection before the two-year survival and maintenance period commences.  The inspection determines whether easement boundaries are correct, if planting and forest retention match the FCP, that protective signs are in place, that any violations are mitigated, that invasive species are being managed, and that the public is being educated.  A plot survey of reforestation and afforestation areas is completed to determine FCP compliance and tree survival.  A survival rate of 90% or better is required to initiate the two-year survival and maintenance period. A survival rate of 75% or better is required after two years.  Inspections may continue until the developer brings the project into compliance with the FCA.

If the DRP determines that there are encroachments or violations during the two-year survival and maintenance period, the developer must correct these issues. After the two-year survival and maintenance period ends, the DRP enforces FCA regulations. The DRP first tries to correct violations through public education and cooperation. After that, DRP can issue warning notices and civil citations to force compliances. Any collected fines fund DRP's restoration plan for mitigation of the site.

Howard County provides the following recommendations for project success in regards to forest conservation:

1. Request an extension from DPZ if a project is incomplete.
2. Verify the installation and replacement of forest conservation signs prior to scheduled inspections.
3. Educate the local community of forest conservation objectives and regulations.  It is best to respond to small problems before they become big problems.
4. Routinely monitor easements to assess tree survival and identify site-specific stressors.  Planting the right trees for a site will cost less than repeatedly replacing the wrong trees.  A developer may need to revise an FCP to deal with a problem.
5. Numerous invasive species thrive in Howard County and are capable of overtaking existing and planted trees.  Once again, routine monitoring and management can prevent a small problem from becoming a big problem.

Howard County Board of Appeals approves farm use as wedding venue

The Howard County Board of Appeals approve the use of a farm on Jennings Chapel Road as a wedding venue and antiques store

Urban Farming

The ABA has a great article on urban farming and the zoning issues that affect it:

http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/plowing_over_can_urban_farming_save_detroit_and_other_declining_cities_will

Green Tax Credits

Howard County is considering implementing tax credits for LEED certified homes. The Baltimore Sun reports:

Under the bill, owners of newly built homes that meet the "silver" standard in Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED certification, awarded by the U.S. Green Building Council, could receive up to a 25 percent discount on their county property tax bill, while homes with the highest LEED rating could earn a 75 percent discount the first year.

LEED stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. LEED certification indicates that the building being certified achieves sustainability by meeting criteria in the following categories: sustainable sites, water efficiency, energy and atmosphere, materials and resources, indoor environmental quality, locations and linkages, awareness and education, innovation in design, and regional priority. Buildings are scored on a scale of 0-100; the higher the score, the better the property meets sustainability standards under the LEED rubric. The resulting scores are then classified as silver, gold, or platinum.

The proposed tax credit in Howard County would provide homeowners who have achieved different levels of certification with different tax credits. According to the Sun,

"The legislation would give homeowners in Howard who have a LEED-certified silver rating a 25 percent tax credit. Those with "gold" certifications would receive a 50 percent discount, and "platinum" ratings would yield a 75 percent discount against county property taxes.... After the second year registering for the credit, a homeowner would have a 25 percent decrease each year, lowering their tax credit allotment. After four years, the credit would expire."

USGBC has a Maryland branch, which can provide individuals with more detailed information about LEED certification in Howard County.

Zombie Ground Rents

Just when I thought Halloween was over, zombie ground rents seem to have risen from the dead.

The Baltimore Sun had a great article detailing the recent Maryland Court of Appeals ruling which overturned the method of extinguishing ground rents created by the Maryland Legislature in 2007. Ground rents are a tenure, created by a grant in fee simple, where the grantor reserves to himself and his heirs a  rent, which is the interest of the money value of the land. Ground rents apply to the real estate, but not the structures attached to the land, such as a home or outbuilding. Zombie ground rents are those with no active - or in some cases known - ground rent owner.

Ground rents in Maryland are often vestiges of colonial America, with some dating back to the 1600s. The fees associated with the ground rent are often nominal. Some ground rent owners do not attempt to collect the fees, as the costs associated with the collection are deemed too high compared to the actual rent. Additionally, some ground rent owners do not know that they have the right to collect at all, as they received the right as an inheritance. Absentee ground rent owners can make selling property incredibly difficult for homeowners, especially those seeking a mortgage from an out-of-state bank unfamiliar with the peculiarities of Maryland's ground rent system. Additionally, in Maryland, the owner of the ground rent can place a lien against the buildings if the ground rent is not paid. This has led to many difficulties for homeowners who are looking to sell their home, only to discover that a lien was placed upon the building.

In 2007, the Maryland State legislature attempted to remedy these difficulties by passing a law requiring ground rent owners to register their right with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation. If the ground rent was not registered, a homeowner whose property was encumbered could pay a fee and have the property released from the ground rent. On October 25, 2011, the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that this provision of the ground rent legislation was invalid. The case, Charles Muskin, Trustee v. State Department of Assessments and Taxation, No. 140, September Term, 2010, held that not registering a property did not eliminate the property rights held by the ground rent owner. The Court held that the legislation provided for a taking without just compensation of the property rights of the ground rent owner, and noted that the legislation provided no method for appeal once the rights were extinguished. The court also noted:

Real property and contractual rights form the basis for economic stability, such as it is, has been, and will become again hopefully. Allowing the “mere will of the Legislature” to shift drastically the fee simple ownership of land or cancel contractualobligations will shake further the confidence of citizens in their constitutional protections from government interference.

Haunted Houses

Happy Halloween!

Happy Halloween, Howard County!

I just finished carving my pumpkin, and, in the spirit of the season, I thought I would share with you a little legal horror story, which I first heard in law school.

The case in question is Stambovsky v. Ackley, 169 A.D.2d 254 (NY App. Div. 1991). The facts of the case are thus:

Helen Ackley owned a home in Nyack, New York. She and her family had repeatedly reported the home as being haunted by poltergeists. Their tales of supernatural disturbances had appeared in the local newspaper an three occassions, as well as Reader's Digest. The home was also included on a walking tour of the city of Nyack as a haunted house.

A few years later, Ms. Ackley put her haunted house on the market with Ellis Realty. Jeffrey Stambovsky signed a contract to purchase the house, and made a down payment of $32,500 on the purchase price of $650,000. Mr. Stambovsky was not from Nyack and was unaware of the spooky character the home possessed. Needless to say, when he did hear of the otherworldly haunts who were told to roam the home, he wanted out of the contract. He did not attend the closing for the sale of the house, resulting in his forfeiting of the down payment.

Mr. Stambovsky sued Ms. Ackley for the return of the down payment. The New York Supreme Court (their trial court) dismissed his action, as New York followed the property law doctrine of caveat emptor - buyer beware - and said that the seller had no duty to inform a potential buyer of the alleged hauntings. Mr. Stambovsky appealed. The appellate court reversed the decision. The appellate court said that while caveat emptor would normally bar a recission action, in this case "the most meticulous inspection and the search would not reveal the presence of poltergeists at the premises or unearth the property's ghoulish reputation in the community". While the court did not say that it believed in ghosts, because Ackley had made the claim so well known the court ruled that the house was haunted as a matter of law.

The legal term for a haunted house is stigmatized property, as it is property which buyers or tenants may shun for reasons that are unrelated to its physical condition or features. A haunted house has a phenomena stigma, but not all jurisdictions recognize this as something that needs to be disclosed. Other types of stigma include criminal stigma (where the house was a brothel or drug den), murder/suicide stigma, public stigma (where the house is famous to many people and any reasonable person can be expected to know of it), and debt stigma (where the previous owners were hounded by debt collectors at the home).

We at Taylor Legal wish you a very happy and safe Halloween!

Banks Giving Away Foreclosures

Earlier in the week, the Washington Post reported that some banks are giving away foreclosed properties rather than trying to maintain and sell homes in blighted areas. The article highlighted the efforts in Cleveland to minimize the damage an abandoned home can do to an already depressed neighborhood. In Cleveland, the Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corporation receives properties from banks which donated under an Ohio law passed in 2009 designed to created county land reutilization corporations (LRCs) - which are being referred to as land banks.

Land banking is a traditional method of investing. A purchaser will acquire large tracts of undeveloped land and hold the property until the time it becomes profitable again. In Cleveland, however, the Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corporation operates a little differently. The group "is committed to the healthy, sustainable redevelopment of Cuyahoga County. The CCLRC will exhibit this ongoing commitment through efforts such as deconstruction, the appropriate and innovative re-use of vacant land, and the use of energy efficient, green rehabilitation and new construction standards."

Zoning and the Residential Business

Earlier in the month, Katherine Taylor posted to our blog an article from the Small Business Association (SBA) which highlighted some of the difficulties that residential – i.e. home based – businesses face. The SBA estimates that up to 50% of small businesses are run out of a person's home. With the increasing use of internet tools, such as video-conferencing and online faxing services, those with an entrepreneurial spirit can easily jump-start a company from their garage.  Additionally, with larger businesses employing furlough days and flex-time, traditional corporate work is being performed at home.

Having a home based businesses is not without it's challenges. Zoning laws for home based businesses are often very stringent. The SBA notes that zoning codes frequently prohibit signs, vehicles of certain classes, exterior improvements relating to the business, and outdoor storage. Additionally, zoning codes can limit the number of employees of a home based business and the number of visitors.

In Howard County, there are a few very specific zoning regulations (opens a .pdf) that a home based business should be aware of:

• The home-based business can't occupy more than 33% of the gross floor area of the dwelling OR 800 square feet, whichever is less;
• The business owner can't have clients visit in a detached garage;
• There can be no exterior evidence of the business;
• Only certain occupations are allowed to conduct home-based businesses.

While this is by no means a comprehensive list, it gives a general idea of the difficulties faced by a potential business owner seeking to establish their business out of their home. Some of the regulations are very sensible - let's face it, no one wants a semi-truck rolling up their street at three in the morning so the neighbor can get the latest shipment of widgets; however, in an economy that is not based on manufacturing but on intellectual products, home based businesses are likely to have little impact on the residential characteristics of the neighborhood.

For those looking to start a residential business, the SBA does have a great page on establishing a home based business.

What is Eminent Domain?

Earlier this week, I posted a news article on Howard County tabling eminent domain. So, what is eminent domain? Black's Law Dictionary, 8th edition, defines eminent domain as "The inherent power of a government entity to take privately owned property, esp. land, and convert it to public use, subject to reasonable compensation for the taking." Black's quotes John E. Nowak and Ronald D. Rotunda's Constitutional Law :

The term 'eminent domain' is said to have originated with Grotius, the seventeenth century legal scholar. Grotius believed that the state possessed the power to take or destroy property for the benefit of the social unit, but he believed that when the state so acted, it was obligated to compensate the injured property owner for his losses. Blackstone, too, believed that society had no general power to take the private property of landowners, except on the payment of a reasonable price. The just compensation clause of the fifth amendment to the Constitution was built upon this concept of a moral obligation to pay for governmental interference with private property. (quoting Bauman v. Ross, 167 U.S. 548, 574, 17 S.Ct. 966, 976 (1897).

Council to table eminent domain

Baltimore Sun/Explore Howard article on the County Council tabling council member Greg Fox's eminent domain legislation

If the house is a rockin'...

As the entire world knows by now, on 23 August 2011, a 5.8 earthquake occurred in the Central Virginia Seismic Zone . I was working from my home-based Taylor Legal http://www.taylorlegal.com/ office in Howard County, Maryland when the vibrations hit at around 1:55 pm, EST. I didn't even realize I was experiencing an earthquake until the shaking stopped.

While I grew up on Maryland's Eastern Shore, I lived in Kansas for almost a decade before settling in Howard County. In Kansas I became accustomed to tornadoes, having gone storm spotting (a major departure from my normal tornado mode of hiding in the basement with the local weather on the TV). I've seen hail the size of softballs, and lived through a micro-burst. I'm even okay with hurricanes, as advance warnings are sufficient to take cover and batten down (as I am doing now in preparation for hurricane Irene's approach). I can honestly say that I am not comfortable with earthquakes. What started as a small rumble evolved into a very loud shaking, and I felt like I was surfing in my office chair. The whole thing lasted about 30 seconds and was over so quickly, it didn't even occur to me to evacuate. Fortunately, we didn't sustain any damage to our current home – just a few pictures became cockeyed, and a candle migrated across the table.

The events made Katherine Taylor and me wonder -- as we were later discussing contract language for a couple of upcoming residential real estate settlements in which we represent the buyers -- what disclosures concerning earthquake damage, earthquake soundness or seismic activity must be made by a residential home seller to a buyer? I flipped through the most recent three-page Maryland Residential Property Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement, and there is no direct mention of seismic activities. If a building had suffered damage to any of the covered areas (i.e., foundation, heating system, etc.) of which the seller has knowledge, then would it have to be disclosed on the form? What if a buyer has moved from out of state and, not knowing that Maryland has had seismic activity, does not ask whether there have been any earthquakes? Does the seller have to disclose that there was an earthquake (even if the seller is not aware of any actual damage to the seller's home)? As Maryland building codes do not specifically address seismic engineering, there could be damage which is not apparent. Granted, earthquakes are rare events here. Allview Estates and Columbia were the sites of a series of small earthquakes in 1993 and again in 1996, but these were of a magnitude no greater than 2.0.

I looked at California's requirements, as that state experiences frequent seismic activity. The California Department of Real Estate offers a 79 page booklet called Disclosures in Real Property Transactions (link opens a .pdf), which requires sellers to disclose the absence of foundation anchor bolts; unbraced or inappropriately braced perimeter cripple walls and first-story walls; unreinforced masonry perimeter foundation and dwelling walls; habitable room or rooms above a garage; and water heaters that are not anchored, strapped, or braced. Additionally, the California Seismic Safety Commission has developed a Homeowner’s Guide to Earthquake Safety (link opens a .pdf) for further clarification and guidelines about earthquake safety.

Who would have thought that earthquake activity could become a question for a buyer in a real estate transaction in Maryland?

Feel free to contact our office if you need any further information.